The performance of Corbyn & May at their respective Conferences has highlighted just how unstable our current political situation is and that neither Labour nor the Tories have answers (or the ability) to the country’s problems
Corbyn had the difficult task of one hand wanting to appear to be hoping for an immediate General Election while all the time hoping the Tories hang on until the Brexit negotiations have been completed. The worst outcome for Corbyn would be to win a 2018 election by a narrow margin (and no polls are predicting a Labour landslide) and having to conclude the negotiations with the EU.
This would leave him not only having to deal with the inevitable post-Brexit recession but not being able to blame the certain bad deal we will get (and even a no deal will be a terrible deal) on the Tories.
One certainty will be that none of the grandiose plans he outlined in Brighton will be able to be implemented as the UK will not have any money to spare, indeed any post-Brexit administration will most likely have to start implementing swinging cuts in all public spending,
Still, Corbyn did what he is very good at, a talented orator & campaigner on issues, he gave a great speech, full of flowing phrases, making expansive promises for action that would, if implemented, bankrupt the nation even if we had a robust economy, not one tottering on the edge of the Brexit cliff. The only thing missing was any credible ideas of how to pay the promises or how they would be implemented (and remember nor toft heh Labour Front Bench have any experience in running very much!).
May also had a difficult job to do as well. In the face of a Cabinet tearing itself apart as they jostle for prime position to replace her, with the Brexit talks going from bad to worse with, a worsening economic climate (also brought on by Brexit) and after the disastrous (and unnecessary) General Election in June, May had to try to reinvigorate her party and give them a sense of purpose, not an easy task for a charismatic leader and a great orator and May is neither.
She is an efficient technocrat with a tendency to micro-management but she has never been accused of being a deep political thinker & strategist so it was no surprised her speech was flat. Even with the excuse of the coughing fit, it was not a speech that will send her depleted troops out to battle for her. Even her “Big ideas” don’t stack up, £2bn for 20000 social homes means on about 50 in each local council area across the UK, not so fantastic after all and even the Tories were rubbishing the Energy Bill freeze when Labour proposed it.
So where does that leave us? One party lead by a fantasist leader with no grasp on the reality of power and the other party, falling apart and lead by a failed technocrat with no vision. Neither has any grasp of what is needed to unite the country, neither has a realistic vision that will allow everyone in our county to have a better future, both offer a dark future with little hope for the young, the poor & the disadvantaged. Time to look elsewhere for leadership.
Carl Assar Eugén Lindbeck, the left wing Swedish economics professor said in 1971 “Next to bombing, rent control seems in many cases to be the most efficient technique so far known for destroying cities”
Does Corbyn want to destroy all the cities in the UK? Because that is what will happen if he is serious about implementing Rent Control in them. Landlords will cease to maintain in their properties or simply stop renting them out altogether if they can’t get a return on their investments. How will this help those wanting to rent?
The best way to lower rents in our cities (and in towns & villages which have the same problem) is to invest in new social housing & renovate existing homes, As the 2017 Lib Dem Manifesto said, we need to build 300,000 homes a year, allowing councils to build the houses that families need rather than the ones developers can make the most profit on.
While it sounds a great policy from a Party Conference podium, rent controls won’t work without adjusting the supply of housing to make more homes available.
Just like Farage and the other Brexit campaigners, Corbyn is guilty of trying to sell the equivalent of snake oil to the people on the UK, warm words, great sound bites, empty promises. It might fool some of the people some of the time, but we can’t build a better future for our nation on such policies. In the end, if Corbyn gets his way, it will be the poor and the young who will struggle to find affordable housing, the very people Corbyn pretends to support.
Today has been another sad day as we heard our Prime Minister make yet another speech of surrender to the forces that would drag us out of the EU
When our PM says the United Kingdom never felt at home in the EU, she does not speak for me.
She does not speak for the millions of other Britains who are proud of their European Citizenship, who look forward to visiting friends and family across our continent, who are as at home in Worksop as in Dusseldorf or Rome or Trondheim or Madrid, who enjoy visiting and living in other nations across the EU.
Indeed, I have never been so ashamed of being British as when I hear this xenophobic rubbish from the likes of May, Farage and other short-sighted, small brained, politicians.
What made this speech even harder to stomach was the paucity of vision
The Brexit Referendum was June 2016, Article 50 was invoked in March 2017, yet in September 2017, our PM finally gets around to trying to explain that she thinks the rest of the EU should allow us special status as part of the Brexit process, even though much of that has already been excluded as a possiblity by the EU.
Is it me failing to grasp the interlaces of a complex negotiation or is it simply that May has no idea what the EU will allow us to have, has no clue in how to negotiate and is at a complete loss as to how to proceed?
How can May promise a Transitional Period or anything else from Brexit? It is not in her (or anyone else in the UK) power to do this. The EU nations (as well as the Commission, European Parliament and a number of Regional Parliaments) have to agree to this. She can ask for this but she is a supplicant in no position to demand anything. By making such demands she risks even getting any deal and we will be left in March 2019 with no Transitional Deal, with not trade agreement, and probably with no trade either
Brexit was already going to be a car crash as the realities of it mean we will lose much of our biggest market for export, drive investment away and make the UK a place people did not want to do business.
Not having a plan of how to proceed, not having a realistic idea of what we can get from the negotiations and ignoring exactly who has to agree with the final deal will mean that Brexit is going from being a car crash to a motorway pile up with the mislead and lied to working people of the UK being the ones who will suffer the most
I have fought to keep the UK in the EU for the last 2 years, I will carry on that fight until the thought of my country being outside of the biggest Trading Block, the biggest Union of Sovereign Nations working together for mutual peace and prosperity is nothing more than a bad memory.
Nothing I have heard from the Government or the others who want to drag us out of the EU has made me waver from my position. There has been no evidence, no hint that there is even a glimmer of hope for most people in the aftermath of Brexit
Like many others, #ExitfromBrexit is not just a slogan, it is the only way to secure a better future for me, my children and my grandchildren.
We must not let Brexit happen.
The post is disturbing on so many levels, not least because of the disregard for the truth by journalists. No doubt the false version is now lodged on the minds of those who read these sad excuses for newspapers and will be dragged up in anti-Muslim propaganda in the future.
The tabloid press (and I include The Times in that description) lied about the story of the little girl put into care with a Muslim family.
Here are 10 of their worst lies – along with the real facts of the case as we know them:
1) According to court documents, it was the police not the local authority (as stated by the tabloids) who decided the child should be put into foster care:
2) According to court documents, the foster family criticised by the tabloids was a temporary placement.
3) According to court documents, the child herself is from Muslim heritage and her Muslim grandmother has now been cleared by the courts to look after her. This fact is only disputed by the girl’s mother but none of this was mentioned by the tabloids as it would obviously totally destroy their narrative:
4) The temporary foster…
View original post 387 more words
I used to be quite well disposed to Jeremy Corbyn. While I disagreed with many of his ideas and policies, I thought he was at least honest and straight forward. I always had the idea he was principled, he has stood up to Blair, rebelling literally 100’s of times against the Labour Party in Commons votes, and, while obviously not up to the job of leading the Labour Party, he was going to give to it a go and try to change how politics is done. He always seemed to be a bit embarrassed by the excesses om the Momentum group but he was too loyal to criticise them publicly.
I was annoyed he hadn’t be more vocal in the Remain campaign (although at the time he professed to support staying in the EU) but, given the way the media reduced the arguments down to a split in the Tory party, it wasn’t surprising. Many other Labour politicians did the same as well
However, my views about Corbyn have changed in the last few months. The Labour Party Manifesto was an uncosted hard-left plan for the future of the UK which ignored the fact that if the UK leaves the EU and the Single Market will mean widespread job losses mostly affecting ordinary workers and leaving the UK economy in a recession that will make the one Labour gave us in 2008 look like mild downturn.
Too many of the policies put forward looked good at first glance but on further examination failed to help the less well-off (the people Corbyn claims t be fighting for) more than richer people. A good example was his plan to summarily do away with Tuition Fees. Pitched as a way of getting more people from poorer backgrounds into higher education, it ignored that (because of the changes made by the Lib Dems to the way the Tuition Fee loans are repaid) we currently have record breaking numbers of such young people at University.
Another area was Corbyn’s pledge to abolish Zero Hours Contracts (where employers do not guarantee any work but only pay for the hours an employee actually works). While there are no doubt many abuses of such contracts by bad employers, they are also very good for some who want to work but (for many reasons) do not want to commit to working a set number of hours every week. Rather than try to deal with the abuses in such contracts (exclusivity, shortness of notice that people aren’t needed, pressure to accept any hours offered, etc), Corbyn though that a short snappy headline was better even if it meant those who want to such contacts (and benefit from the flexibility they give) would be penalised.
Since the election last month, Corbyn has grown stronger and more bold . Labour MPs who have (unusually) been pro-EU and worked hard for the last 2 years in the Remain Campaign have been forced to abstain on votes to keep the UK in the Single Market and sacking shadow spokespeople who ignored Corbyn’s diktat (rather ironic considering Corbyn’s own record).
Then yesterday, Corbyn revealed himself to be nothing more than a two-bit popularist, willing to lie and dissemble just like others in the Brexit camp, just to secure power. Two statements stand out and show him up to be without principle.
Firstly, during the elction campaign, he worked hard to give the impression that not only was he going to abolish Tuition Fees but that he was going to wipe existing Student Loan debts. Agreed, he never said exactly that, just that he would “deal” with it, he left it to others to “expand” on it and say they would do that. Yesterday, he denies ever saying such a thing.
Secondly, he spoke on the Andrew Marr Show about Brexit and said we could not be in the Single Market if we left the EU (ignoring the fact that other non-EU countries are), possibly a genuine mistake or possible a lapse of memory but still wrong and not corrected. He then went on to say “has been used to “destroy” the conditions of British workers“. This directly contradicts the findings of a LSE report on “Brexit and the Impact of Immigration on the UK” that has been available for over a year. One of its findings was “There is also little effect of EU immigration on inequality through reducing the pay and jobs of less skilled UK workers. Changes in wages and joblessness for less educated UK born workers show little correlation with changes in EU immigration.”
By using such inflammatory speech about EU migrants who have come here to work and contribute to our society, Corbyn has shown himself to be no better than UKIP & Nigel Farage. We already have rising violence against people from the EU in many party of the country and Corbyn has, intentionally or otherwise, given yet more justification to those who take part in such racist attacks.
Corbyn is no longer worthy of any respect and, unless the Labour Party and its members condemn his remarks, neither is the party he leads.